I'm not saying their way is the right way, but it's the way they came up with, and I suspect they tried every alternative they could find before settling on it, and they wouldn't have had to do anything if their user base had been honest enough to pay for the product rather than steal it.Īs an aside, it wasn't just amateurs doing the stealing either. When your product is being stolen 19 times out of 20, it really behoves you to figure out some way to tighten things up. At one time, Photoshop was THE MOST PIRATED SOFTWARE in the world, with over 95% of the copies in use being pirated copies and the shareholders were not happy about it. The rental model was something that Adobe really didn't want to go with, but the level of piracy of the software more or less forced them into it. To be fair, I am something of a power user of the software, someone who is using their image editor to clone out a few stray hairs from their cat pictures and doesn't ever upgrade their cameras won't see much by way of advantage. The cost to do this was quite a bit more than what I am paying per month for my Photoshop/Lightroom package, and with the package, my software is always as up to date as Adobe makes it. My upgrade from 6.0 to 7.0 was to get a raw processor. Generally, I upgraded to ensure my raw processor was sufficiently up to date to process the files from a new camera. Every time a new version came out, there was something added to it that I wanted, and so I upgraded. I've been paying for Photoshop since version 6.0. Does Topaz work with DNG files yet? If it doesn't, you don't have forwards compatibility like you get with Adobe and DNG files. You have a full product, no longer making use of development services, so no reason to keep paying.Yup, and then you buy a new camera and your software will no longer open it's files until you pay for another update. ![]() ![]() The purchase price gets you one year of updates, but that final version is yours to keep using as long as you want. I rather like how Topaz runs their business model. ![]() Especially for a light user that doesn't use the program very often, when it actually becomes a worse value proposition to rent the software monthly. People want to pay one price for a complete program and be done with it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |